Re:AMD 6-core Phenom II $222 (5 times cheaper than Core-i7 9...
by Keyframe on Monday April 26, 2010 @10:18AM
(#1294904)
If performance, compared to intel, is anything like magny-cours - it's nothing to write home about. http://www.anandtech.com/show/2978/amd-s-12-core-magny-cours... I would like to see some benchmarks though (especially rendering like cinebench).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AMD 6-core Phenom II $222 (5 times cheaper than Core-i7 9...
by hga on Monday April 26, 2010 @11:25AM
(#1295078)
True, but it's price/performance that I think most of us are concerned about: http://www.anandtech.com/show/2978/amd-s-12-core-magny-cours...
We're also now in a leapfrogging situation, where year by year this may change. AMD is one process node behind Intel; I'm not sure how to count microarchitectures, but ignoring processor interconnects (which Intel has only just started to address by copying the AMD approach) if you consider Core to be more advanced than K8 and Nehalem more than K10 then AMD is also one microarchitecture behind.
Re:AMD 6-core Phenom II $222 (5 times cheaper than Core-i7 9...
by Symmetry on Monday April 26, 2010 @01:55PM
(#1295430)
I found it really odd how much the MC scores increased relative to the Xeon in the one Linux benchmark they ran. Maybe there's something about the that Windows handles NUMA that doesn't agree with AMD's system?