Re:India raises withdrawal limit as rupee anger mounts
by kranner on Monday November 14, 2016 @01:31AM
(#12947923)
I can read Urdu and from what I can make out in images of the note, the Urdu text is fine. The font could have been better. The orthographic sign that makes the H in 'hazaar' is correct; the 'be' nuqta is a different shape. There should have been a hair-width's space after the 'dal' in 'do', but it is easily readable as 'dal' and not 'lam' as some people are claiming.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:India raises withdrawal limit as rupee anger mounts
by sufiyan on Monday November 14, 2016 @01:48AM
(#12947972)
Yes. So, can I read Urdu and the hey looks like a bey. ب has the dot below it which you can clearly see in all images. ح doesn't have any dots beneath it.
Re:India raises withdrawal limit as rupee anger mounts
by kranner on Monday November 14, 2016 @02:40AM
(#12948139)
Hazaar is spelt with a choti he which does have that inverted comma under it (clearly distinguishable from a nuqta by the elongated head shape, as it is on the note (but it is tiny because the font size is tiny)).
Here's an example of hazaar with the spelling I mean: https://lh3.ggpht.com/FXu7LY_Ki5uDcYTcOWwMSxAL0lC9ttGLbNZrrT...