Re:Diamonds Suck (2006)
by chc on Sunday November 13, 2016 @05:35PM
(#12946109)
"Cheap" as a criticism is not usually about price, but about perceived value.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006)
by thaumasiotes on Sunday November 13, 2016 @05:40PM
(#12946134)
The value of a courtship gift is its price.
So a self-written poem is worth less than a purchased fortune cookie?
I agree with your sentiment, but the retort would be that even a few minutes of your time has more monetary value than that cookie.
The diamond cartels love this kind of thinking. It should be about value, not price.
With a diamond, you are not getting value (except in some rare circumstances involving unusual stones).
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006)
by thaumasiotes on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @01:30AM
(#12956079)
It is not a good thing for courtship gifts to have value; if they have too much value they are likely to be dishonestly accepted by someone who isn't interested in the giver but does want the object.