News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by chucky_z on Sunday November 13, 2016 @02:51PM (#12945243)
Try the second-hand market, and buy the stone you like, and the ring you like (sperate). It's extremely in-expensive (usually included in the cost of the ring if you buy it at a store) to have your stone set into the ring of your choice.

I spent a total of $500 to have a .75ct diamond set in a ring this way.

Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by Nullabillity on Sunday November 13, 2016 @06:11PM (#12946317)
$500 is still an insane price for a glorified lump of coal.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by chii on Sunday November 13, 2016 @06:41PM (#12946471)
Compared to the wedding, 500 dollars is nothing.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by coldpie on Monday November 14, 2016 @09:36AM (#12950000)
That would be a significant fraction of our wedding costs. We held ours in our back yard, ordered some catering, served buffet-style, about 50 guests. No DJ, just set up some playlists on Google Music. There's no requirement to blow five figures on a one-day party, just some bizarre social expectation.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by zeroer on Monday November 14, 2016 @12:50AM (#12947802)
Don't over-generalize. I got married for a total price of about $700. One can be frugal if one decides that saving money is a priority.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by Grishnakh on Sunday November 13, 2016 @10:19PM (#12947289)
Not if you get married in Vegas at a chapel with a small handful of family members. It's still a fraction of that cost, but a reasonably-large fraction (maybe 1/10 at most, instead of 1/100).
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by brianbreslin on Monday November 14, 2016 @09:40AM (#12950024)
where does one search the 2nd hand market for these things? I'd be worried I'd be ripped off (granted I worry about that in a jewelry store too).