News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AdultFriendFinder was hacked by rikkus on Sunday November 13, 2016 @02:26PM (#12945104)
A common interview question for penetration testers is how you might design password storage to allow this 'feature' without having to store the plaintext password. It's possible, I guarantee it.
Re:AdultFriendFinder was hacked by lfam on Sunday November 13, 2016 @02:52PM (#12945253)
That sounds interesting. Can you explain how to do it?
Re:AdultFriendFinder was hacked by chedabob on Sunday November 13, 2016 @04:32PM (#12945793)
Re:AdultFriendFinder was hacked by StavrosK on Monday November 14, 2016 @05:44AM (#12948863)
SSS doesn't look like it pertains to this discussion at all. How do you use this to store single digits securely?
Re:AdultFriendFinder was hacked by mnw21cam on Monday November 14, 2016 @06:47AM (#12949167)
If you have an method for requiring n out of m key parts to use the key, it is fairly easy to see how this can be used to require n out of m characters from a password. The only problem is that just a few characters doesn't have a large enough entropy to prevent the whole thing being brute forced very quickly.
Re:AdultFriendFinder was hacked by StavrosK on Monday November 14, 2016 @09:41PM (#12955203)
> If you have an method for requiring n out of m key parts to use the key, it is fairly easy to see how this can be used to require n out of m characters from a password.

It doesn't sound very easy to me at all. Can you explain in more detail?

Re:AdultFriendFinder was hacked by StavrosK on Sunday November 13, 2016 @02:56PM (#12945279)
How? I would be very interested in a solution for that, past the obvious and insecure "hash each character separately".