Re:Nvidia on new self-driving system: “basically 5 years ahe...
by enraged_camel on Saturday November 12, 2016 @07:15PM
(#12941012)
>>This is not accurate however. Other important senses in use include proprioceptive, hearing and tactile feedback from wheels. In addition to vision and the improved dynamic range of eyes, there is the important fact that human vision integrates a world model into expectations. Human vision also models time and motion which help manage where to focus attention. Humans can additionally predict other agents and other things about the world based on intuitive physics. This is why they can get on without the huge array of sensors and cars cannot. Humans make up for the lack of sensors by being able to use the poor quality data more effectively.
Yes, but all those things you listed are very imperfect and can increase the risk of mistakes. For example, someone two lanes over honking their horn can cause a momentary distraction for you ("are they honking at me?"), causing you to not notice a cyclist cutting in front of you. And so can a dancing clown on the sidewalk.
Re:Nvidia on new self-driving system: “basically 5 years ahe...
by Cybiote on Saturday November 12, 2016 @08:55PM
(#12941402)
Very much so and that's why we don't want our cars to perfectly replicate humans. More sensors plus a limited and narrow AI is better than just vision and a smarter AI.
Yes, but all those things you listed are very imperfect and can increase the risk of mistakes. For example, someone two lanes over honking their horn can cause a momentary distraction for you ("are they honking at me?"), causing you to not notice a cyclist cutting in front of you. And so can a dancing clown on the sidewalk.