News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Python Versions Used in Commercial Projects, 2016 Edition. Parent comment

Re:Python Versions Used in Commercial Projects, 2016 Edition by majewsky on Friday November 11, 2016 @09:46AM (#12931026)
Taking a guess here: Maybe all the people who are concerned about performance have moved to PyPy?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Python Versions Used in Commercial Projects, 2016 Edition by xapata on Friday November 11, 2016 @11:34AM (#12932134)
That or using NumPy for any arithmetic bottlenecks.

But the new dict and a few other optimizations in 3.6 will make attribute lookups pretty close to C++ speed if not the same.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Python Versions Used in Commercial Projects, 2016 Edition by vuanotino on Friday November 11, 2016 @10:12AM (#12931295)
They don't support 3 :(
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Python Versions Used in Commercial Projects, 2016 Edition by majewsky on Friday November 11, 2016 @10:36AM (#12931531)
What, PyPy? Their homepage states 3.3.5 compatibility: http://pypy.org/
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Python Versions Used in Commercial Projects, 2016 Edition by xapata on Friday November 11, 2016 @11:31AM (#12932111)
And they're skipping 3.4 going straight to 3.5
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Python Versions Used in Commercial Projects, 2016 Edition by vuanotino on Friday November 11, 2016 @11:28AM (#12932084)
Oh, I am sure they didn't last time I checked. Thank you.
[ Parent | on HN ]