He died of natural causes at 70. According to viral stories at the time, moments after having seen the first print of his book.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giordano_Bruno
People may also confuse Bruno with Galileo Galilei, who was punished by the Inquisition for his defense of Copernican theory, but not executed.
You are right, but I hope you are aware that this would require a giant leap to an essentially superhuman state of rationality and clear thinking for a vast majority of people.
Just stop for a moment and look around you. Is that how most people actually function in this world?
For large majorities of voters, dropping that ballot in the box is over 90% an identity game.
On an individual level, being active in (non-political) hobbies and volunteer groups can help, especially ones that attract both people from the cities and the countryside.
Fail to recognize that, and you've failed before you've started.
How is this different from stereotyping then?
What we need, fundamentally, is a media environment that can harness the collective capacity of humans to vet and debate new information in an organized fashion that can be trusted. This site is a good example where a knowledgeable community, and the simple mechanism of votes does some automatic, crowd-based content curation. But the Reddit-like model is very basic - so much more could possibly be done to allow individual users to contribute to a collective process of knowledge-building.
I think we need more development and discussion devoted to what kind of systems could be designed to encourage transparency, quality, and critical analysis in our news-making.
As a kid I learnt this and tried to be as rational and aware of my fallibalities as possible.
That makes you an alien to normal human beings. Conversation becomes impossible, processing fast enough becomes impossible, and the penalties for acting weird and communicating weird are huge.
Instead you need to find a way to act in a manner that allows you to blend in with people.
I'm not saying that one smart game is going to fix the entire problem, but adding the development of logic skills into the types of activities that people enjoy doing on Facebook is definitely possible.
Other humans are taking advantage of those gaps to mobilize votes or advertisements.
There's no way out and I've been wondering when people would realize the depth and intricacy of the mess we're in. Hopefully people pay more attention to the way cognitive cheat code are being abused.
Hopefully a protocol to deal with it can be made.
Exactly right. This should be strongly emphasized in our educational curriculum.
Remember that evolution favors individuals who survive & gain status, not those whose representation of the world is true. Someone who is right but killed for it (eg. Copernicus) is still dead.
The fix is for people to be aware of these cognitive biases in themselves, to actively seek out information that differs from their preconceptions, and to challenge inaccurate information (with evidence!) when presented with it. You can't outsource this to a communication platform, because it's inherently less comfortable and more effort for the reader, and the reader will just go to a competing communication platform that makes them feel better.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusory_truth_effect
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandwagon_effect
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congruence_bias