News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Peter Thiel’s Bet on Donald Trump Pays Off by muninn_ on Thursday November 10, 2016 @10:31AM (#12921179)
"multiply that by the probability that it will change the election and then multiply it by the benefit of having 1 candidate over the other on your personal economic outlook"

No you can't just loop that in there. The cost of walking to and from the polling location, fine, but these kinds of costs are the costs you have to pay to live in a democracy. I waited in line for over an hour before work. If I extrapolate my salary out, I paid probably $10 worth of my time to vote. Considering that is once every 4 years, that's not much to live in a democracy where we get to vote to choose our representatives.

Re:Peter Thiel’s Bet on Donald Trump Pays Off by mrep on Thursday November 10, 2016 @11:49AM (#12921968)
> but these kinds of costs are the costs you have to pay to live in a democracy

Not really, we could randomly choose a few thousand people to vote and it would be practically just as effective without all the costs of having everyone vote. Better yet, you would probably get a better sample of the population too since it would not be biased towards people who normally vote.

Re:Peter Thiel’s Bet on Donald Trump Pays Off by M_Grey on Thursday November 10, 2016 @11:52AM (#12921993)
You'd need perfect security... I mean perfect, or that would be a trivially easy system to control. The irony that the government subject to such a process would be needed to ensure the sanctity of that process should not be lost on you.
Re:Peter Thiel’s Bet on Donald Trump Pays Off by mrep on Thursday November 10, 2016 @12:01PM (#12922070)
True, but our current system is more like security through size in that we hope the sheer number of votes drowns out voter fraud.

They both have problems and I'm not saying one is totally better than the other.

Re:Peter Thiel’s Bet on Donald Trump Pays Off by problems on Thursday November 10, 2016 @10:41AM (#12921287)
That would be a good response, except you can still live in a democracy without voting. You're just accepting that generally a plurality of the voting population will make a reasonable decision rather than saying you need to take part in that yourself every time.
Re:Peter Thiel’s Bet on Donald Trump Pays Off by muninn_ on Thursday November 10, 2016 @10:50AM (#12921380)
I'm not sure how this is related to the cost/benefit of voting? Yes you can not vote and still live here. And? (I'm not trying to be argumentative, just don't understand).
Re:Peter Thiel’s Bet on Donald Trump Pays Off by gjm11 on Thursday November 10, 2016 @11:53AM (#12922004)
I think it's a reply to your description of voting as one of "the costs you have to pay to live in a democracy". You don't, strictly, have to pay that cost.
Re:Peter Thiel’s Bet on Donald Trump Pays Off by M_Grey on Thursday November 10, 2016 @12:06PM (#12922111)
Have you seen Trump's EPA pick? We're all going to pay one way or another.
Re:Peter Thiel’s Bet on Donald Trump Pays Off by muninn_ on Thursday November 10, 2016 @12:30PM (#12922354)
Ah I see. Thanks