Re:General Motors to Lay Off 2,000 Employees in Ohio and Mic...
by mseebach on Thursday November 10, 2016 @10:01AM
(#12920879)
You ARE being preachy. You're calling people who drive SUVs 'rude about' actually being climate deniers, with zero effort applied to try to understand and empathise with what might motivate these people.
It's so easy to point to other peoples apparently wasteful behaviour from a distance, and much easier than introspection. So the question is reasonable: Have you "deliberately" been on a not-absolutely-necessary long haul flight this year? Because then you don't really have anything to tell families who prefer SUVs.
Re:General Motors to Lay Off 2,000 Employees in Ohio and Mic...
by angry_octet on Thursday November 10, 2016 @05:11PM
(#12924964)
This 'If you're not a vegan bicycle rider don't tell me what to do' logic is absurd.
The point is that people have so little understanding of what is going on with the climate they won't even modify their behaviour slightly, even when getting a sedan with higher efficiency and better safety will cost them much less.
So no, I'm not calling SUV owners rude, it's a rhetorical device to highlight that they are metaphorically thumbing their noses.
I got to break it to you, this is not about making sure you get your fair share of the pie. This is about there being any pie at all.
And whatever the reason is that people are deliberately choosing massively more costly vehicles (in terms of gas and capital costs), there needs to be a lot more persuading of people in their purchasing decisions. It needs to be not cool to buy a truck to drive to the office.
I'm sure their will be an electric F350 (massive torque! The Model S P85 weighs half as much but has 50% more) but do we all need to drive one to work?!