News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Donald Trump’s Contract with the American Voter [pdf] by m_mueller on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @08:21PM (#12916797)
That is exactly the issue. If you really want to solidify the carbon for long term storage, you'd have to spend more energy than you gain in the first place. At least I'm not aware of a process that could capture CO2 for long term storage with only a fraction of the Carbon-to-Carbon binding energy (which is what you gain when burning, minus the C-O2 binding.
Re:Donald Trump’s Contract with the American Voter [pdf] by infinite8s on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @10:46PM (#12917554)
This is exactly what photosynthesis accomplishes, using energy from the sun.
Re:Donald Trump’s Contract with the American Voter [pdf] by m_mueller on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @11:48PM (#12917825)
At which point you can just use solar cells and batteries? I mean you do get high energy density with coal, but the downsides just seem too much.