News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:After protest, Lenovo adds Linux compatibility to Yoga 90... by Alupis on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @02:15PM (#12913583)
Typically OEM's are paid per install of crapware (regardless if the user ends up paying for the subscriptions).

It's just a form of marketing for these companies - ie. a certain percentage of potential users will convert into paying users.

The reason Windows laptops have been cheaper or the same price as the linux counterpart is usually due to the combination of subsidized licensing from Microsoft, crapware installation kickbacks, and lower cost of support infrastructure (the OEM already has a huge Windows support staff and infrastructure, creating a new one for Linux - or more correctly, a specific distro of linux - costs more).

If the linux laptops sell more and more, eventually the support costs will come down to on-par (or lower perhaps... who knows). It's a chicken-and-egg problem, and one that OEM's are not willing to foot the bill up front for. We have to vote with our wallets and take that short-term hit in order to push the ecosystem in that direction.

Re:After protest, Lenovo adds Linux compatibility to Yoga 90... by marcosdumay on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @03:23PM (#12914258)
Support might be a reasonable reason, yes.

But crapware can not pay that much. The crapware creators themselves get less revenue than licensing costs, and they can kick back just a fraction of that revenue. (That is, unless they have another business model that isn't selling licenses or spying on users.)

Re:After protest, Lenovo adds Linux compatibility to Yoga 90... by Alupis on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @03:48PM (#12914473)
Margins on computers are notoriously thin.

Even say, $1.00 per system sold with crapware pre-installed can make a difference in the profitability of a product line at scale. Then there's the kickbacks for when a customer does pay for a subscription.

Re:After protest, Lenovo adds Linux compatibility to Yoga 90... by marcosdumay on Thursday November 10, 2016 @06:25AM (#12919509)
The crapware can not pay more than the Windows cost, simply because it does not have enough revenue.

Unless, of course MS is paying the OEM to install Windows, or billing for Linux computers. Or crapware has some business model that I'm not aware of.