News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:California has legalized recreational marijuana by corey_moncure on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @01:17PM (#12912974)
The inclusion of the word "interstate" was clearly intended to place a limitation on jurisdiction. With interpretations like this one, is there currently a form of commerce for which the interstate commerce clause has not been construed to apply?
Re:California has legalized recreational marijuana by mcherm on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @02:50PM (#12913952)
> ...was clearly intended...

So says you. But have you been appointed to the US Supreme Court? If so, your opinion hardly matters.

Re:California has legalized recreational marijuana by wl on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @02:12PM (#12913535)
No.