Hillary won the popular vote - I'm not sure there is such a thing as a "silent majority" for a candidate that lost the popular vote?

We don't use the popular vote for anything in the US. It's a completely meaningless metric.

Your statement does not provide support for their being a silent majority for Trump. But I hope people consider what you said when someone talks about how Hillary or the media or whatever is part of the corrupt "Establishment".

It doesn't matter whether there was a "silent majority" for Trump or anyone else because we don't attach any importance to a majority vote at the national level. Nor should we. If we did, three metropolitan areas in New York and California would dictate the outcomes of our Presidential elections.

But I hope people consider what you said when someone talks about how Hillary or the media or whatever is part of the corrupt "Establishment".

That, on the other hand, is no longer questionable.

https://www.google.com/#safe=off&q=pied+piper+candidates+wik...

Good thing the rules are agreed to before the competition. BTW, the popular vote hasn't been completely counted, and probably never will be. Absentee ballot, which generally favor Republicans, will not be counted in any of the states that didn't have a close margin of error(read: most of the red states). In a close election like this, you really have no ground complaining about popular vote.

Very true and worth remembering for anyone planning to run for elected office in the future.