News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The smug style in American liberalism by foldr on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @10:39AM (#12910939)
I think this is wrong in two respects. First, the statement has not lost its meaning but only its effect. Second, the claim that Bush and Romney were racists was not a major strand of political discourse. People talked about Republican policies rooted in racism, but that is a very different thing from having a presidential candidate who is himself, on a personal level, a racist.
Re:The smug style in American liberalism by jessaustin on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @01:19PM (#12913019)
Bill Maher is no genius, but even before the election he had already identified this lack of credibility, the umpteenth time some random Republican is deemed beyond the pale:

http://www.salon.com/2016/11/07/bill-maher-liberals-cried-wo...

Re:The smug style in American liberalism by foldr on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @01:27PM (#12913105)
There are always people on each side making outrageous allegations about each candidate. The question of whether Romney was a racist was not a major issue in the previous campaign.