News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Live Presidential Forecast by protomyth on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @11:04PM (#12905962)
I leave work and I see Clinton is the probable winner. I drive home, get some dinner, and I get a text from the WSJ that stock futures are crashing because Trump might win?!? What the friggin hell pollsters? I get the feeling some explaining on the part of the newspapers and new networks is in order.
Re:Live Presidential Forecast by tedunangst on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @11:25PM (#12906031)
Well, the reason we still have the election instead of just polling people is because the polls aren't always accurate.
Re:Live Presidential Forecast by Jtsummers on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @01:05AM (#12906593)
Polls don't tell you who will vote.

60% of a state may be for one candidate, but if only 80% of them go out to vote, the other candidate will win.

That's what we're seeing here today.

Re:Live Presidential Forecast by tedunangst on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @02:58PM (#12914034)
80% turnout. Hahaha.
Re:Live Presidential Forecast by Jtsummers on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @03:35PM (#12914361)
Fair, that would be way too high. I was really meaning to reference relative turnout for each candidate. That is, which party or candidate is better at actually getting their voters to do their job and vote.
Re:Live Presidential Forecast by 3apo on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @11:24PM (#12906024)
For poll statistics this is like cigarettes not causing cancer moment