Re:A Formal Security Analysis of the Signal Messaging Protocol
by tptacek on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @12:01PM
(#12901868)
Again, the idea that Signal's developers were "gagged" or "blackmailed" is a lie, and you should be embarrassed to repeat it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A Formal Security Analysis of the Signal Messaging Protocol
by styyle14 on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @04:05PM
(#12903936)
In a security sense, this is actually a very real concern with which even a warrant canary cannot help. Could you provide hard evidence that Signal's developers have NOT been "gagged" or "blackmailed"? I think such a proof would be infeasible at best.
[dead]