I had a leg up b/c I remembered that my source was slashdot.
The important part:
a major piece of evidence used against Lyons in his
arrest was the record of his supermarket purchases
that he made with his Safeway Club Card. Police
investigators had discovered that his Club Card was
used to buy fire starters of the same type used in
the arson attempt. For Lyons, the story did have a
happy ending. All charges were dropped against him in
January 2005 because another person stepped forward
saying he or she set the fire and not Lyons.
So I was wrong, and it was arson, not murder, but the point remains that the police were willing to use purchasing habits/items as circumstantial evidence to go after the wrong person.Hopefully it is not a great leap in logic to see that the justice system was what went wrong, not the club card thing.
China may have a totally different understanding on what is allowed and what not. The whole privacy data thing doesn't worry me very much in my country. But it's scary when i think of other countries.
It's the same as claiming that your privacy is safe because the company has a 'privacy policy' in place. In reality, the privacy policy say that it can change at any time and that the company has no legal obligation to notify you of these changes. These policies may change due to a change in direction at the company, or because the company is losing money and decides to sell that information to the highest bidder to stay afloat... Maybe the company is even swallowed by a larger company that then revokes all of the old privacy policies...