News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A machine learning approach to identifying thought marker... by oelmekki on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @09:38AM (#12900540)
This is a good point. I guess the difference here will be "how much do we trust human judgement?" and "how much do we trust AI predictions?". If AIs make 10% less errors than humans but we have 50% more trust in them, that's a problem. Eugenics were not a problem because science was wrong, but because people blindly trusted it to apply where it should not.

There are a lot of things to consider, here, those are exciting times for thinking.

There are no comments on this comment yet.