News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on IAB Statement on IPv6. Parent comment

Re:IAB Statement on IPv6 by Spooky23 on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @08:50AM (#12900178)
IPv6 != No NATing.

Example: Verizon Wireless.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:IAB Statement on IPv6 by cm2187 on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @12:56PM (#12902406)
You mean IPv6 != No Firewall. Firewall are going to cause pretty much the same problems as NAT.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:IAB Statement on IPv6 by proactivesvcs on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @09:20AM (#12900379)
Quite. But there's no need, nor excuse for NAT on IPv6.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:IAB Statement on IPv6 by CountSessine on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @10:30PM (#12905861)
True, but that's just kind of dumb.
[ Parent | on HN ]