News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Formal Security Analysis of the Signal Messaging Protocol by eganist on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @08:38AM (#12900079)
> And the counterpoint is? ‘People should give Google/Apple root access on their devices to run this new secure messenger’?

I feel like you might've misstated your intended point, but in any case:

- Most threat models exclude the situation which you're discussing here because risks are generally low and, in the event of such a threat becoming material, the entity is probably screwed regardless of whether that threat is considered due to the costs of mitigation. (Seriously -- how would a company or person mitigate this short of independently auditing the code for the OS? Or building their own? And what happens after you look at the code? Do you then look at the hardware too? How low would you go? How low would your attackers go, for that matter?)

- If you're the target of attackers who would actually try to gain access to your device through compromising the device maker, you've got bigger problems.

The philosophical argument doesn't really work here because there's no practical solution that anyone can (or would, really) adequately fund.

P.s. just to clarify, I'm not tptacek.

There are no comments on this comment yet.