News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google foobar by mikro2nd on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @07:01AM (#12899533)
This is a test.

Good luck.

If you logged in after clicking the link on an unnamed app having unknown capabilities, and of unknown provenance, you have failed the test.

Re:Google foobar by jdpedrie on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @09:10AM (#12900309)
Is *.google.com really "of unknown provenance"?
Re:Google foobar by tremon on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @09:24AM (#12900421)
no, but it is suspected of "having unknown capabilities".
Re:Google foobar by RubyPinch on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @09:38AM (#12900539)
who knows what google might do with google's information.
Re:Google foobar by axtscz on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @09:37AM (#12900530)
Time travel?
Re:Google foobar by smoyer on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @09:35AM (#12900510)
the login is *.withgoogle.com.
Re:Google foobar by tedmiston on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @11:45AM (#12901711)
It's commonly known that withgoogle.com is a site Google uses for marketing and non-services sites.
Re:Google foobar by mikro2nd on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @09:44AM (#12900599)
Yes. Just because the app is hosted on a google domain tells us nothing about who developed it, what their intent might be, what data it might be gathering as/when you log in,...

It's basically a black box, and any suggestion that it ought to be trusted "because Google" is naive in the extreme.

Re:Google foobar by brhsiao on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @12:05PM (#12901920)
I wonder what clearances you have to go through at Google to get your project into a toplevel directory or subdomain?