Re:A machine learning approach to identifying thought marker...
by denzil_correa on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @06:58AM
(#12899520)
I'm not even sure why people report ONLY accuracy as an evaluation metric. It means nothing - appropriately weighted F scores, precision, recall give more insight into the system.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A machine learning approach to identifying thought marker...
by dasboth on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @08:18AM
(#12899947)
Completely agree. Although if your binary classes are perfectly balanced then accuracy is a valid metric, but that's rarely the case.
I guess the problem is that an ROC curve wouldn't create flashy headlines.
Re:A machine learning approach to identifying thought marker...
by denzil_correa on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @09:31AM
(#12900477)
> I guess the problem is that an ROC curve wouldn't create flashy headlines.
You can, you just need to put in a little bit of work. We don't need to specify the exact accuracy in the title.