News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on IAB Statement on IPv6. Parent comment

Re:IAB Statement on IPv6 by avar on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @05:21AM (#12899043)
I work for one of the companies on that wall of shame. I wonder to what extent it has the reverse of the intended effect. "Oh so not even Amazon, Twitter or GitHub gives a crap about IPv6? Why should we?".
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:IAB Statement on IPv6 by CountSessine on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @10:16PM (#12905813)
Oh so not even Amazon, Twitter or GitHub gives a crap about IPv6? Why should we?

If this is really what they're thinking, then they have no pride in their work and will never be the best at what they do. I suspect most of the engineers working for Amazon, Twitter, and GitHub are well aware that they're lagging in ipv6, and are very intent on catching up.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:IAB Statement on IPv6 by lmm on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @06:31AM (#12899374)
It seems to have worked for python 3.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:IAB Statement on IPv6 by dom0 on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @07:13AM (#12899594)
I kinda doubt that the site had a real influence on that.
[ Parent | on HN ]