Re:We’re Scientists, Moms, And We Avoid Non-GMO Products
by Thimothy on Monday November 07, 2016 @05:02PM
(#12895624)
Well, the explanation for that looks like it's a job for survivorship bias, isn't it?. I mean, we could not know about the huge amount of people that have died by betting their livehood in the wrong risk. Only that the stakes are higher this time, we are not talking about a few tribes trying their hand with agriculture, but messing with the food chain in a way that could spread continent-wide easily.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:We’re Scientists, Moms, And We Avoid Non-GMO Products
by Kalium on Monday November 07, 2016 @05:11PM
(#12895692)
It's possible! We do know about a number of societies that perished because their conservatism got them out-competed.
That sort of competition hasn't gone away. The world of people capable of using CRISPR isn't going all agree to a cartel-type pact to never do certain things. There's too many people and the bar is too low.