News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fusion Garage sold just 64 JooJoos by mixmax on Friday April 23, 2010 @06:20PM (#1289668)
An e-mail sent off to 64 customers is hardly conclusive evidence that these are the only ones. There are a million reasons why they might have sent e-mails to only those 64.

Maybe these 64 people all complained about something specific and fusion garage wanted to look like they cared, maybe this e-mail is one in a batch of who knows how many, maybe they accidentally cc'ed 64 people and bcc'ed the rest, maybe it's just a sample of 64 to see how many would respond, maybe it's a list of only customers from the Phillipines, maybe maybe maybe.

Re:Fusion Garage sold just 64 JooJoos by ericd on Friday April 23, 2010 @06:34PM (#1289691)
Agreed, this article isn't worth anyone's time, except to show how not to manage customer email.

Flagged for being misleading.

Re:Fusion Garage sold just 64 JooJoos by lanstein on Friday April 23, 2010 @06:12PM (#1289651)
hmm. I'm sure there's no particular reason they sent it to 64 people. Not like there's anything special about that number.
Re:Fusion Garage sold just 64 JooJoos by madprogrammer on Friday April 23, 2010 @06:28PM (#1289677)
maybe they are planning to use a 64-bit processor in the next version?
Re:Fusion Garage sold just 64 JooJoos by SamAtt on Friday April 23, 2010 @06:17PM (#1289663)
I'd love to see how many of those addresses (if any) end in @techcrunch.com
Re:Fusion Garage sold just 64 JooJoos by MikeCapone on Friday April 23, 2010 @06:32PM (#1289685)
This doesn't mean anything, except maybe that they should use the BCC field.

Instead of being sensationalistic about it, how about emailing them to let them know about their mistake?

Re:Fusion Garage sold just 64 JooJoos by bond on Friday April 23, 2010 @06:07PM (#1289637)
The train as left the station...