News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We’re Scientists, Moms, And We Avoid Non-GMO Products by Kalium on Monday November 07, 2016 @01:48PM (#12893683)
Clearly, we should also apply the same safety standard to non-GMO crops as well.
Re:We’re Scientists, Moms, And We Avoid Non-GMO Products by yessql on Monday November 07, 2016 @02:10PM (#12893913)
Nature is out there randomly mutating genes without any oversight. We need to test each plant for 100 years to make sure it didn't have any dangerous mutations.
Re:We’re Scientists, Moms, And We Avoid Non-GMO Products by bdamm on Monday November 07, 2016 @02:15PM (#12893975)
A somewhat specious argument, as many foods have undergone the ultimate trial of sustaining people for millennia.
Re:We’re Scientists, Moms, And We Avoid Non-GMO Products by Kalium on Monday November 07, 2016 @02:19PM (#12894027)
The species in general have. I think you'll find most modern strains have not been double-blind tested for a century.

Modern dwarf wheat strains, for instance, date from the 70s or so.

Re:We’re Scientists, Moms, And We Avoid Non-GMO Products by KingMob on Monday November 07, 2016 @03:21PM (#12894675)
An excellent argument for being dubious of modern cultivars.
Re:We’re Scientists, Moms, And We Avoid Non-GMO Products by Kalium on Monday November 07, 2016 @04:11PM (#12895158)
If people are willing to apply the same standards uniformly, I'm OK with it. I suspect that's not actually the case for most people, though. GMOs are seen by many as a special case deserving of infinite scrutiny.