News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Freud’s Discontents by haliax on Monday November 07, 2016 @11:01AM (#12892051)
> We really have to much faith in 'pills' when they are obviously just a temporary fix for something underlying.

This is a pretty broad statement, how do you justify the implicit claim that no psychiatric illness is due to a chemical imbalance in your brain rather than a deep seated psychological issue?

Re:Freud’s Discontents by edblarney on Monday November 07, 2016 @12:03PM (#12892614)
I didn't mean it so broadly, obviously there are some people who need pills. But I'm inclined to believe that anti-depressants, sleeping pills, and things like ritalin etc. are far, far overprescribed.
Re:Freud’s Discontents by Pigo on Monday November 07, 2016 @12:00PM (#12892583)
I didn't feel like the statement carried an implicit claim that no one has schizophrenia, or other cut-and-dry physical problems. Maybe I just read it that way, but I couldn't disagree more if that's what they meant.

I had a childhood friend who was diagnosed with schizophrenia and recently died from an over-dose of heroine. He was diagnosed in his late 20's, not sure when he started suffering, but I've wondered if he'd done better if he'd gotten help sooner.