Re:Forget self-driving car anxiety: In the early days human ...
by cooper12 on Sunday November 06, 2016 @09:38PM
(#12888413)
Time and time again history has shown that you can't just retrofit old laws to stuff that's "similar enough". Because the new technology is never the exact same. Computers are not telegraphs. Email is not postal mail. Cars are not horse-drawn carriages... Law reuse is harmful because it loses nuanced differences in how these technologies operate and are used. I really think a lot of problems are linked to that, such as with drug laws. I would say we need a reform but that would require changing the DNA of the judicial systems, and like this article notes, ingrained prejudices.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Forget self-driving car anxiety: In the early days human ...
by fossuser on Sunday November 06, 2016 @09:43PM
(#12888429)
I think our legal system does change over time with case law and interpretations of existing laws in new mediums.
Though this does have the unfortunate consequence of lagging behind which can sometimes be severe.
Re:Forget self-driving car anxiety: In the early days human ...
by cooper12 on Sunday November 06, 2016 @10:37PM
(#12888634)
The problem is that often this case law is created looking at similar cases as precedent. Instead we should be creating new laws from scratch or else like you said we'll always be playing catchup while areas with more reasonable/reactive laws prosper. However that's antithetical to how current American law works though so it would require changing the whole DNA of the system.