News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Jury finds Rolling Stone responsible for defamation with ... by ptaipale on Sunday November 06, 2016 @03:27AM (#12884154)
I don't think "laziness" is a very good explanation here. The story was so obviously fake that the "journalist" in question actually had to do quite a bit of work to compose this story.

Reporting a real, actual case, completely and honestly, wouldn't have been more work.

But it wouldn't have hit so perfectly the narrative that was the selling point.

There are no comments on this comment yet.