News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Re: License for Google's patent by jfoutz on Friday April 23, 2010 @10:25AM (#1288094)
C* and zeta lisp both supported parallel map reduce at the language level.
Re:Re: License for Google's patent by tghw on Friday April 23, 2010 @10:39AM (#1288144)
At the language level, yes. At the on-computers-all-over-the-world-on-petabyte-datasets level? No. That was Google.
Re:Re: License for Google's patent by jacquesm on Friday April 23, 2010 @10:44AM (#1288165)
That's like those 'on the internet' patents then. Only this time it is the 'on a cluster' variation. Take an existing scheme, implement it on a cluster, instant market lock.
Re:Re: License for Google's patent by tghw on Friday April 23, 2010 @11:00AM (#1288223)
Yeah, it's not that simple. You're talking about one of the biggest scaling problems ever addressed. You have to figure out how to shard the data, how to deal with failures and inconsistencies, how to return results from terabytes of data, and how to make it all fast enough that your search results come back in less than a second.
Re:Re: License for Google's patent by gsmaverick on Friday April 23, 2010 @11:47AM (#1288364)
Map-reduce isn't used in search queries only for indexing.