News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Jury finds Rolling Stone responsible for defamation with ... by tbihl on Saturday November 05, 2016 @01:44PM (#12880846)
Do you think I didn't answer parent's question? I thought I had, but if you disagree, you should address that more directly. As to the agenda you think I'm pushing: I'm sorry I didn't adequately allude to my sarcasm. I guess I just thought it was too hyperbolic to be taken any other way.
Re:Jury finds Rolling Stone responsible for defamation with ... by oldmanjay on Saturday November 05, 2016 @03:31PM (#12881459)
Sarcasm is an ambiguous tool in text. I admit to an extreme current sensitivity to being told to be terrified by normal occurrences. My apologies.