Re:Samsung Recalls 2.8M Top-Load Washing Machines
by kw71 on Friday November 04, 2016 @11:55PM
(#12878076)
I use hot water in laundry sometimes and that is a cost that you didn't mention.
My front loader takes a longer time to do a wash cycle, and I think its better spin cuts drying time by 1/3.
Re:Samsung Recalls 2.8M Top-Load Washing Machines
by shostack on Saturday November 05, 2016 @08:21AM
(#12879443)
How do you avoid mold and mildew issues when leaving damp clothes in there that long?
Re:Samsung Recalls 2.8M Top-Load Washing Machines
by tzs on Saturday November 05, 2016 @10:13AM
(#12879838)
I didn't even know that could be an issue. I did some Googling, and it appears that how long you can leave clothes in the washer depends on local conditions, with many people reporting that they get a full day or more before it becomes a problem.
I guess I have good enough local conditions to allow for the several hours mine often sit in the washer. Maybe at some point I'll do some experiments and try to see what the limits are here, probably after I get around to building the temperature and humidity sensor network that I want to put throughout my house to better understand my HVAC system's performance.
My water comes from a private well and ultimately ends up in the drain field of my septic system and then presumably eventually makes it back down to the local table from whence it came. For me the cost of water is simply the cost of electricity for the well pump. I've never measured the power usage of the pump, but based on the voltage it runs at and the current rating of the circuit breaker on its circuit, and the rate it pumps water, and my electricity rates, the most it would cost to fill a large top loader is about $0.05, and so that is an upper bound on what a front loader could save me on water costs.
From what I've read the energy savings of a front loader comes from it drying better during the spin cycle, so you don't use as much energy when you use your dryer to dry the load. However, I usually do the wash in the morning, and then don't get around to moving it to the dryer until the evening. By then it has dried out quite a bit on its own, and is really just damp rather than wet. The dryer makes short work of it.
I'd have the same timing with a front loader, and so from the dryer's point of view the difference would be damp vs. less damp, not wet vs. less wet, so there would not be much energy savings.
I doubt that these tiny savings on water costs and dryer energy could make up the price difference over the lifetime of the unit.