Docker in Production: A History of Failure

Re:Docker in Production: A History of Failure by X86BSD on Friday November 04, 2016 @12:58PM (#12874040)

SmartOS, FreeBSD, Tredly, etc

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Docker in Production: A History of Failure by SSLy on Friday November 04, 2016 @06:19PM (#12876636)

Tredly is "just" a FreeBSD distribution. And Linux can't have ZFS in-tree because CDDL.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Docker in Production: A History of Failure by X86BSD on Friday November 04, 2016 @06:29PM (#12876715)

It is not just a version of FreeBSD. The base is FreeBSD but the tooling for containers is not stock. It's value added bits that are shaping up to be very nice for containers on a more stable, secure, and storage friendly stack.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Docker in Production: A History of Failure by SSLy on Friday November 04, 2016 @07:03PM (#12876950)

Yes, but the storage parts which the discussions are about are from FreeBSD

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Docker in Production: A History of Failure by mmagin on Friday November 04, 2016 @03:16PM (#12875144)

Ah, you must be from the alternate universe where most of us have heard of more than one of those!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Docker in Production: A History of Failure by eropple on Friday November 04, 2016 @06:48PM (#12876851)

What you've heard of, and what's workable and useful, do not necessarily intersect.

[ Parent | on HN ]