News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on ZeroMQ 4.2.0. Parent comment

Re:ZeroMQ 4.2.0 by jpm_sd on Friday November 04, 2016 @11:05AM (#12873124)
A postmortem on nanomsg begs to differ: http://sealedabstract.com/rants/nanomsg-postmortem-and-other...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ZeroMQ 4.2.0 by montyedwards on Friday November 04, 2016 @12:59PM (#12874042)
Not disagreeing with you or the postmortem, but:

1. that post is from Feb 8, 2016

2. nanomsg 1.0 was released on June 10, 2016

After nanomsg 1.0 release, recent activity on github includes:

8 days ago -- fixes #828 Add logical connections to UDP RFC

9 days ago -- fixes #827 nanomsg zerotier mapping rfc errors

11 days ago -- fixes #825 Extra tests in pipe.c gdamore committed 11 days ago

15 days ago -- fixes #800 accept4 not implemented on all systems

15 days ago -- fixes #783 WS transport - not connectable from Firefox

16 days ago -- fixes #821 NN_WS_HANDSHAKE_CRLF is silly

And etc.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ZeroMQ 4.2.0 by widdma on Friday November 04, 2016 @03:04PM (#12875037)
After that, Garrett D'Amore eventually returned on condition he be BDFL. See https://github.com/nanomsg/nanomsg/issues/619

Since then the project looks to be fairly healthy.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ZeroMQ 4.2.0 by omginternets on Friday November 04, 2016 @08:52PM (#12877487)
Oh good! This is the guy behind mangos, too.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ZeroMQ 4.2.0 by omginternets on Friday November 04, 2016 @02:26PM (#12874753)
Hmm I missed it. In addition to the sibling comment above, the mangos project seems alive and well.
[ Parent | on HN ]