News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What Pro Computing Could Be by dfabulich on Friday November 04, 2016 @06:01AM (#12871405)
> We wrote the beginnings of an operating system

I want better hardware, but as a pro software developer, I can't really adopt a fundamentally different operating system, even if it is "better."

I don't care how nice your hand-crafted kernel is; if I can't run a JVM, Node.js, and the Android toolchain on it, I can't do my professional work on it.

Re:What Pro Computing Could Be by Corrado on Friday November 04, 2016 @09:56PM (#12877711)
I don't know about that. NExT was pretty revolutionary and it worked really, really well. If they could have gotten the hardware price down to something a college student could afford I might be typing this on a completely different stack.

Sometimes a radical shift is what's needed. Apple is the new Microsoft and might just be ripe for a disturbance.

Re:What Pro Computing Could Be by Eridrus on Friday November 04, 2016 @09:44AM (#12872453)
And that's not even getting to the tricky parts like virtualization or CUDA drivers.
Re:What Pro Computing Could Be by mamcx on Friday November 04, 2016 @11:58AM (#12873566)
I have dreams about this, and think the bare os must be a kind of hypervisor.

Then, on-top, you can launch "classic" OS like windows, linux, etc. Then also, the new OS.

Re:What Pro Computing Could Be by abm2205 on Friday November 04, 2016 @12:54PM (#12874006)
i've had the same thoughts. I think the future might be hyper-visors hosting operating systems of all types, each one serving a singular purpose for which is configured to serve most optimally.
Re:What Pro Computing Could Be by inimino on Friday November 04, 2016 @08:55PM (#12877498)
From a UI perspective, how is this any better than just running your preferred OS and firing up a VM when you need to?