BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS

Re:BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS by conductor on Thursday November 03, 2016 @05:40PM (#12868247)

@pornin

Thanks, we definitely need a secure and reputable TLS implementation with small footprint for IoT devices.

[invalid issue removed]

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS by tomlogic on Thursday November 03, 2016 @06:02PM (#12868396)

q starts out larger than len, but is decremented inside the inner for loop.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:BearSSL – Smaller SSL/TLS by conductor on Thursday November 03, 2016 @06:08PM (#12868451)

Thanks, it seems the separate from variable decrease operator (q --) broke my "internal parser" as I completely missed it somehow. I'll edit my post to remove the noise.

[ Parent | on HN ]