MicroG Project: A re-implementation of Google's Android apps and libraries

Re:MicroG Project: A re-implementation of Google's Android a... by _pmf_ on Thursday November 03, 2016 @12:12PM (#12865238)

> The case is going before the CAFC, which means a likely win for Oracle.

Frankly, everything else would be a travesty.

My personal wet dream is that in response to this, Google will partner with Microsoft to get dotNET as a VM backend.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MicroG Project: A re-implementation of Google's Android a... by yarrel on Thursday November 03, 2016 @01:35PM (#12866082)

LOL.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MicroG Project: A re-implementation of Google's Android a... by colemickens on Thursday November 03, 2016 @12:35PM (#12865486)

"dotNET"? sometimes I just don't know where people come up with their capitalization schemes.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MicroG Project: A re-implementation of Google's Android a... by colemickens on Thursday November 03, 2016 @03:31PM (#12867190)

Oh jeez, I'm so sorry for pointing out that .NET has literally never been branded as "dotNET".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MicroG Project: A re-implementation of Google's Android a... by _pmf_ on Friday November 04, 2016 @03:49AM (#12870959)

I did not downvote you, but the reason I used dotNET is that I don't want to keep in mind whether the markdown-flavor-du-jour interprets leading dots as special or not.

[ Parent | on HN ]