Re:Return of the Mac (2005)
by BipolarElsa on Tuesday November 01, 2016 @07:36PM
(#12851106)
Yeah but if you want to develop in C++, Java or C# you're gonna need visual studio thus rendering macOS useless.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Return of the Mac (2005)
by unrealhoang on Tuesday November 01, 2016 @10:15PM
(#12851793)
For C#, there is an obvious need for a Windows machine (at least for now). But I don't see the reason why I need to have visual studio to develop C++ or Java. Especially Java, where IntelliJ is just simply better and it's available everywhere.
Xamarin Studio is good enough for Unity3d and Mono.
Why would you need VS for c++, or especially java? The both have plenty of IDE's.
Re:Return of the Mac (2005)
by BipolarElsa on Wednesday November 02, 2016 @04:06AM
(#12852972)
What are the top IDEs for C++ and Java for macOS? Thanks.
For java you've got eclipse and intellij, probably more. I don't know about c++.
There's always emacs/vim in any case.
Re:Return of the Mac (2005)
by BipolarElsa on Wednesday November 02, 2016 @05:06PM
(#12859265)
Emacs is s o f u c k i n g h a r d t o u s e
A high learning curve is fine for a tool you'll use the rest of your life.
Re:Return of the Mac (2005)
by BipolarElsa on Thursday November 03, 2016 @05:56AM
(#12862645)
It's 3 in the morning and I've been tinkering with Emacs since Noon. Is it just me or is Emacs oddly addictive?
Re:Return of the Mac (2005)
by RotsiserMho on Tuesday November 01, 2016 @10:04PM
(#12851740)
I develop in C++ and have been happy with a combination of Qt Creator and XCode.
If you want to develop in C#, anything except msw10 renders useless, including that program.
Re:Return of the Mac (2005)
by BipolarElsa on Thursday November 03, 2016 @05:57AM
(#12862647)
Can you elaborate? I don't understand.