Re:Transcontinental anaesthesia: a pilot study (2013)
by veritas3241 on Tuesday November 01, 2016 @01:55PM
(#12848448)
> What better monitoring and tools should provide is better quality anesthesia, which is a whole big story in itself with many interesting components.
To add to this, my wife is studying to be a Nurse Anesthetist and I'm always amazed that there are plenty of docs who insist on using the intubation tool that doesn't have a camera vs the one that does. I'd say around 20-50% the time they have to get the one with the camera to help out anyways. Why not just use the one with the camera if it's there.
There's a lot of value to be added in the complementarity of humans and machines, particularly in anesthesia.
To add to this, my wife is studying to be a Nurse Anesthetist and I'm always amazed that there are plenty of docs who insist on using the intubation tool that doesn't have a camera vs the one that does. I'd say around 20-50% the time they have to get the one with the camera to help out anyways. Why not just use the one with the camera if it's there.
There's a lot of value to be added in the complementarity of humans and machines, particularly in anesthesia.