Re:Walmart Will Manage Distribution Centers with OneOps, Jen...
by 101km on Tuesday November 01, 2016 @05:02AM
(#12844255)
Nothing to do with hyperkube.
PetSets are simply ordinally ordered container collections instead of randomly ordered.
The usual concept in Kubernetes is that a container has a name like 'thing-randomsuffix4242'. It is pushing you towards making your pods stateless and not precious so the failure handing logic is simple. If it is blown away for whatever reason can easily be replaced by the scheduler and 'thing-randomsuffix242b' is never far away.
With a predictable ordering you can actually make assumptions you otherwise couldn't. For example, perhaps you want the convention that 'thing-predictable1' is the master and 'thing-rpredictable{2,3}' are the slaves.
Re:Walmart Will Manage Distribution Centers with OneOps, Jen...
by sandGorgon on Tuesday November 01, 2016 @11:41AM
(#12846749)
hyperkube is just a repackaging of all the different packages of k8s as a single binary.
so rather than 'kubectl -v', you will run 'hyperkube kubectl -v'
Re:Walmart Will Manage Distribution Centers with OneOps, Jen...
by tmzt on Tuesday November 01, 2016 @02:30PM
(#12848811)
Closer to minikube then? That was not at all clear to me from reading the site, where it seemed to be discussing a kubelet on an OS on bare metal or hypervisor, but not managing containers.
For instance, would a complete Windows Server instance fit the Pet Set concept in the scheduler?