Re:The Cancelled Comma One Would Have Embarrassed the Car In...
by smrtinsert on Tuesday November 01, 2016 @09:55AM
(#12845709)
Who brags about 2000 loc when safety is at risk? Seems very immature, and not confidence inspiring.
Re:The Cancelled Comma One Would Have Embarrassed the Car In...
by Houshalter on Wednesday November 02, 2016 @05:35PM
(#12859524)
Actually I think fewer lines of code is less risk. Added complexity creates more points of failure, more possible bugs, more unexpected edge cases. Complexity is not inherently desirable.
Doesn't surprise me, after reading http://www.bloomberg.com/features/2015-george-hotz-self-driv...: "Instead of the hundreds of thousands of lines of code found in other self-driving vehicles, Hotz’s software is based on about 2,000 lines."
In general I like the approach of using deep-learning instead of complex hardcoded rules (see the article above for more details), but even with deep-learning you're going to need a complex ruleset in order to deal with the edge-cases.
Getting a prototype of a self-driving car working is probably much less than 5% of the overall amount of work that's required. Getting the car respond correctly to the long tail of edge cases is the other 95% of the work.