News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Cancelled Comma One Would Have Embarrassed the Car In... by gst on Monday October 31, 2016 @11:47PM (#12843234)
> There were major problems with every demo I saw of the product.

Doesn't surprise me, after reading http://www.bloomberg.com/features/2015-george-hotz-self-driv...: "Instead of the hundreds of thousands of lines of code found in other self-driving vehicles, Hotz’s software is based on about 2,000 lines."

In general I like the approach of using deep-learning instead of complex hardcoded rules (see the article above for more details), but even with deep-learning you're going to need a complex ruleset in order to deal with the edge-cases.

Getting a prototype of a self-driving car working is probably much less than 5% of the overall amount of work that's required. Getting the car respond correctly to the long tail of edge cases is the other 95% of the work.

Re:The Cancelled Comma One Would Have Embarrassed the Car In... by smrtinsert on Tuesday November 01, 2016 @09:55AM (#12845709)
Who brags about 2000 loc when safety is at risk? Seems very immature, and not confidence inspiring.
Re:The Cancelled Comma One Would Have Embarrassed the Car In... by Houshalter on Wednesday November 02, 2016 @05:35PM (#12859524)
Actually I think fewer lines of code is less risk. Added complexity creates more points of failure, more possible bugs, more unexpected edge cases. Complexity is not inherently desirable.