News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:WebAssembly Browser Preview by idle_zealot on Monday October 31, 2016 @03:04PM (#12839880)
There are also a few good ones. I think if it's put to a vote/tournament a good one will be picked.
Re:WebAssembly Browser Preview by amyjess on Monday October 31, 2016 @03:59PM (#12840357)
The HTML5-style shields are the most practical options. They fit with other web technologies, and they don't try to obscure the name of the project like the logos in the first comment (Pointing arrows and "assembled" people? Really?).

Also, the "negative space" logo is incredibly slick, and I'd love to see it used on some project even though the HTML5-style shields are more practical for WASM.

Fogaccio's binary-inspired WA ligature looks really professional, too.

Re:WebAssembly Browser Preview by nkrisc on Monday October 31, 2016 @04:07PM (#12840434)
Yeah the Fogaccio one is one of the better ones. It also has the domain-specific benefit of working great as ASCII art. That's not usually a requirement of logos but it's a nice benefit here.
Re:WebAssembly Browser Preview by plaguuuuuu on Monday October 31, 2016 @10:24PM (#12842894)
Fogaccio looks cool and high tech, but I personally like the retro arcadey, "8-bit" ideas, execution notwithstanding.

I like it when design has a real sense of personality, and having the logo be retrofuturistic would be cool :-)

Re:WebAssembly Browser Preview by nkrisc on Monday October 31, 2016 @03:16PM (#12839988)
There's a couple that are nice. A good logo doesn't just come from nowhere though. There's a lot of work that goes into all the really good logos you see.
Re:WebAssembly Browser Preview by IshKebab on Tuesday November 01, 2016 @09:10AM (#12845357)
Or so say highly paid logo design companies anyway...
Re:WebAssembly Browser Preview by imh on Monday October 31, 2016 @03:39PM (#12840191)
We'll pick Logo McLogoface!!