News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:WebAssembly Browser Preview by chillydawg on Monday October 31, 2016 @02:00PM (#12839265)
Where the sandbox now has a much larger attack surface as it has to implement a whole new virtual machine to run the webasm.
Re:WebAssembly Browser Preview by gsnedders on Monday October 31, 2016 @02:05PM (#12839326)
Nobody's writing a whole new VM to run it; everyone is just treating it as another input format to their JS VM.
Re:WebAssembly Browser Preview by icefox on Monday October 31, 2016 @04:50PM (#12840810)
Re:WebAssembly Browser Preview by gsnedders on Monday October 31, 2016 @08:30PM (#12842345)
Given the context, what browser is that going into? How is that relevant to browser sandboxing?
Re:WebAssembly Browser Preview by icefox on Tuesday November 01, 2016 @10:35AM (#12845980)
Ah yes within the browser space the various companies are just putting web assembly in/alongside the existing javascript engines. WAVM was just an example of a whole new vm that isn't for a browser, but does run webassembly.
Re:WebAssembly Browser Preview by gsnedders on Tuesday November 01, 2016 @10:42AM (#12846024)
Yeah; I probably should've been more explicit in my original comment: there's definitely new VMs being written for WASM, but none are currently expecting to go into browsers, hence concerns about sandbox escapes from browsers aren't affected by them.