That's precisely why this acquisition is happening now, they're not doing so well and that means they are (relatively) cheap.
That would true if L3 was acquiring Century Link, but Century is acquiring L3.
From the OPs article link:
"In a memo issued to employees Wednesday, CenturyLink CEO Glenn Post said that sinking legacy revenue has resulted in a loss of $600 million a year for the company."
Ah, silly me! I thought there was something weird about L3 buying them but in a way it's even weirder to see it happen the other way around. Thanks for the correction.
Re:CenturyLink to Buy Level 3 for $34B
by chrishacken on Monday October 31, 2016 @10:05AM
(#12836764)
Level 3 is doing phenomenal. I think you have this the other way around.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/centurylink-lay-off-3-000-1305...
Okie Dokie