Re:What else are we getting wrong about programming languages?
by Turing_Machine on Sunday October 30, 2016 @05:06PM
(#12832278)
I think fiddling around with types is attractive to academic researchers because types are relatively easy to reason about mathematically. It's a lot easier to convince others (and possibly yourself) that you're "doing science" if your paper is full of math or math-like constructs.
The factors that make Python, Ruby, Javascript, etc. popular aren't nearly as amenable to formal mathematical analysis.
The factors that make Python, Ruby, Javascript, etc. popular aren't nearly as amenable to formal mathematical analysis.