News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Step-by-step tutorial to build a modern JavaScript stack ... by Klathmon on Sunday October 30, 2016 @08:02AM (#12829321)
Well I can't say I agree in the slightest.

If you treat JS like a toy, it's gonna act like a toy.

Re:Step-by-step tutorial to build a modern JavaScript stack ... by rootlocus on Sunday October 30, 2016 @08:28AM (#12829424)
Treating it as something else won't make it something else. It will just require a "minimal" stack of 10 other technologies.
Re:Step-by-step tutorial to build a modern JavaScript stack ... by Klathmon on Sunday October 30, 2016 @04:11PM (#12831969)
Again, you don't need to believe me, but shoving your head in the sand and pretending it's not useful isn't going to do you any good.

Tons of companies are very successfully using javascript for long-running processes on the server side. And it's not exactly showing any signs of slowing down.

Re:Step-by-step tutorial to build a modern JavaScript stack ... by pikzen on Sunday October 30, 2016 @07:28PM (#12833156)
Mhm, they have been.

Then they rewrote everything from scratch because as it turns out, javascript on the server side is still pretty damn awful performance wise.

Re:Step-by-step tutorial to build a modern JavaScript stack ... by Klathmon on Monday October 31, 2016 @07:28AM (#12835823)
Beats the hell out of Python or Ruby in that department. But regardless, absolute speed isn't the bottleneck in most situations, and in those cases trying to force JS will end you in a world of hurt.

Like most things in life, use it in moderation, and you'll end up much happier. But if you take absolute stances on things, you are only hurting yourself.