Re:Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the 21st Century, in 20 minut...
by quadrangle on Saturday October 29, 2016 @11:27PM
(#12828010)
The definition of evil is not based on being out of touch with reality. "Tragically flawed" would be a better term for what you are talking about.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the 21st Century, in 20 minut...
by orasis on Sunday October 30, 2016 @01:49AM
(#12828355)
I like to define "evil" as a cause whose effects compound negatively toward human wellbeing.
so I think their use of "evil" is fine.
Re:Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the 21st Century, in 20 minut...
by quadrangle on Sunday October 30, 2016 @12:53PM
(#12830785)
The way evil is used as a word by most people, your definition stretches far too wide. The connotation of "evil" is far more appalling than merely anything negative for human well-being. By your definition far too many things are evil to the point where the word is pretty mild, which is not how most people use it.
In short: you are doing poor communication to redefine it so differently from normal use.