Re:WikiWikiWeb is back online
by idlewords on Saturday October 29, 2016 @02:56PM
(#12825660)
This is a regrettable redesign. Every page loads a megabyte of crap (640 KB "names.txt" file + 260KB jquery) and requires javascript for what could be a static text site.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Yeah. This tweet summarizes it nicely:
I wonder why they didn't use the minified version of jquery? Would of been a lot smaller.
Or Zepto. I saw nothing happening that couldn't be done with it.
I really have to wonder why he did it instead of just migrating everything to a strictly static set of pages. no javascript.
the wiki's been locked for quite a while. why not keep it that way. the existing commentary is at least more valuable than the ability to edit it.
provide a static mirror, ward, and I won't have to mirror your "database" of json! ;)
Re:WikiWikiWeb is back online
by rincebrain on Saturday October 29, 2016 @05:21PM
(#12826459)
If done correctly, that could be a constant overhead that the browser caches, and you move on.
That's not particularly helpful for people crawling and not keeping state between page hits, but it should make a difference for end users if done right.
Re:WikiWikiWeb is back online
by TheDrizzle43 on Saturday October 29, 2016 @05:14PM
(#12826428)
The content is gzipped so it actually loads 384kb.