News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel driven MacBook Pros have secondary ARM processor fo... by vigilant on Saturday October 29, 2016 @01:46PM (#12825214)
And what if I turn on the camera for a tenth of a second, take a picture, and turn it off. You won't notice the LED being on for a tenth of a second. Software makes it easier to prevent such things.
Re:Intel driven MacBook Pros have secondary ARM processor fo... by TillE on Saturday October 29, 2016 @03:59PM (#12826013)
You definitely don't need software to add a little delay for turning off the LED, but sure, it would be slightly more complicated than just a dang wire.
Re:Intel driven MacBook Pros have secondary ARM processor fo... by GuiA on Saturday October 29, 2016 @05:42PM (#12826563)
Just wrote a test app on macOS that initializes the camera, gets the first video frame, and turns it off. You definitely notice the bright green LED being on for a split second.
Re:Intel driven MacBook Pros have secondary ARM processor fo... by culturestate on Saturday October 29, 2016 @06:10PM (#12826704)
You only notice it immediately if you're looking for it. I've gone minutes with the camera on before noticing the LED while I was distracted by other stuff on the screen.
Re:Intel driven MacBook Pros have secondary ARM processor fo... by cormacrelf on Sunday October 30, 2016 @05:01AM (#12828779)
Source code?
Re:Intel driven MacBook Pros have secondary ARM processor fo... by CapacitorSet on Saturday October 29, 2016 @01:53PM (#12825263)
Why not both? It is trivial to make a circuit such that the LED is on if either there is power to the camera, or the software tells you to.
Re:Intel driven MacBook Pros have secondary ARM processor fo... by halflings on Saturday October 29, 2016 @02:21PM (#12825476)
I would guess you could do the same with a circuit, even if that means you lose on flexibility (but given the concerns of many users, I'd say it's worthy).